|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Readings for this sectionPetrucci: Chapters 5-4 to 5-6. Oxidation Numbers and REDOX Balancing 08/03/2007Assigning Oxidation NumbersOxidation numbers (ON) are not real charges. They are the results of an accounting method whereby we can keep track of electrons during a chemical reaction. In a few cases, the ON is actually a real charge but only in rare monatomic ions like Cl- and Na+. Oxidation numbers are defined using two premises.
RULES: (taken in order of importance.)
Back to Top
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oxidation |
Zn ® Zn(OH)42– |
| Reduction |
NO3- ® NH3 |
Now add e–, H2O, and OH– (in base).
| Oxidation |
Zn ® Zn(OH)42– + e– + OH– + H2O |
| Reduction |
NO3- ® NH3 + e– + OH– + H2O |
Use algebraic method to balance.
| Oxidation |
|
Zn ® | aZn(OH)42– | + be– | + cOH– | dH2O | |
| Zn | 1 | a | a=1 | ||||
| O | 0 | 4a | c | d | 4a + c + d = 0 | ||
| H | 0 | 4a | c | 2d | 4a + c + 2d = 0 | ||
| Charge | 0 | –2a | –b | –c | –2a – b – c = 0 | ||
| solving: |
a = 1, b = 2, c = –4, d = 0 |
||||||
| balanced |
Zn + 4OH–® Zn(OH)42– + 2e– |
||||||
| Reduction |
|
NO3- ® | aNH3 + | be–+ | cOH–+ | bH2O | |
| N | 1 | a | a=1 | ||||
| O | 3 | c | d | c + d = 3 | |||
| H | 0 | 3a | c | 2d | 3a + c + 2d = 0 | ||
| Charge | –b | –c | – b – c = –1 | ||||
| solving |
a = 1, b = –8, c = 9, d = –6 |
||||||
| balanced |
NO3- + 6H2O + 8e– ® NH3 + 9OH– |
||||||
Both these half reactions are balanced. To get the overall reaction, we need to add these together such that the electrons are canceled. That means 4× the first reaction plus the second:
| Oxidation |
4×[ Zn + 4 OH– ® Zn(OH)42– + 2 e–] |
| Reduction |
NO3- + 6 H2O + 8 e– ® NH3 + 9 OH– |
| Overall |
4 Zn + NO3- + 6 H2O + 7 OH– ® 4 Zn(OH)42– + NH3 |
Now check the balancing to ensure both mass balance and charge balance is correct.
Copper reacts with dilute nitric acid to give nitrogen monoxide NO.

Notice that the ON for nitrogen in NO3– is an extremely unlikely +5. This could never be the actual charge on the nitrogen in any real compound (convincing evidence that oxidation numbers don't represent reality very well).
We have the following two half reactions (use the chemicals joined by the arrows):
| Oxidation |
Cu ® Cu2+ |
| Reduction |
NO3- ® NO |
Now add e–, H2O and H+(in acid).
| Oxidation |
Cu ® Cu2+ (See note below) |
| Reduction |
NO3- ® NO + e– + H+ + H2O |
Now, use algebraic method to balance the two.
| Oxidation |
|
Cu ® |
Cu2+ + 2 e– | |
| In this case, it is very obvious
that balancing this half reaction is easily accomplished by adding two
electrons to the product side. This done, both charge- and mass-balance are
complete.
It's important to realize that although rote methods may always get you the correct answer they are not always the easiest way to solve a problem. |
||||
| Reduction |
|
NO3– ® |
aNO + be– + cH+ + dH2O | |
| N | 1 | a | a=1 | |
| O | 3 | c d | c + d = 3 | |
| H | 0 | c 2d | c + 2d = 0 | |
| Charge | –1 | –b c | – b + c = –1 | |
| solving |
a = 1, b = –3, c = –4, d = 2 |
|||
| balanced |
NO3- + 4 H+ + 3 e– ® NO + 2 H2O |
|||
Both these half reactions are balanced. To get the overall reaction, we need to add these together such that the electrons are canceled. That means 3× the oxidation reaction plus 2× the reduction:
| Oxidation |
3 Cu ® 3 Cu2+ + 6 e– |
| Reduction |
2 NO3- + 8 H+ + 6 e– ® 2 NO + 4 H2O |
| Overall |
3 Cu + 2 NO3- + 8 H+ ® 2 NO + 4 H2O + 3 Cu2+ |
Now check the balancing to ensure both mass balance and charge balance is correct.